Posts Tagged ‘Albert Pujols’

The Curious Case of Al…

May 4, 2012 Leave a comment

In 110 plate appearances this season, Albert Pujols – the greatest slugging first baseman since perhaps Lou Gherig – has a whopping zero home runs. Unless you live under a rock, you probably already knew that. I mean, there have been thousands of words spilled over this pandemic all week. It’s as though the sky is falling. Seriously, repeat after me people:

Small Sample Size.

That’s right, weird things happen in April. Actually, weird things happen at any point in a baseball season, it’s just that those weird things are so glaringly obvious in April when they can’t dissolve into 300 productive at bats. Should the Angels be concerned about Pujols? Absolutely, but their concerns should relate not to this year’s homerless streak, but rather to the way his offensive numbers have declined for three straight seasons. Drastically declined.

In 2009 Albert was coming off a seven year run in which his WAR had not dipped below 8.2 – or superduperstar level. He had hit .327/.443/.658 that year, with a .449 OBA. The year before he’d abused NL pitchers to the tune of a .357/.462/.653 line. He controlled the strike zone (16.4% BB rate) and he mashed the ball (.331 ISO – .250 is considered excellent!). He was the best hitter in baseball and the best player in baseball.

Over the following two seasons however, Pujols’ WAR dropped from 9.0 to 7.5 to 5.1. His OBP went from .443 to .414, to .366. His slugging from .658 to .596, to .541. Perhaps of greatest concern, his walk rate dropped from 16.4% to 14.7% to 9.4%. Those numbers represent a trend. Do they mean that Albert is washed up as a player? Of course not, a player with a .299/.366/.541 slash line is still exceptionally valuable, but these numbers do represent a large sample of evidence that Albert is declining as a player.

Of course, this is information that the Angels knew five months ago, and if it didn’t bother them then, it shouldn’t suddenly bother them after 110 at bats. It should, however, have bothered them then. At 32 Pujols can reasonably expect to have another three seasons similar to the last two he just completed. Perhaps he’ll suffer a mild depreciation of his counting numbers; say, closer to 30 home runs than 40, but generally similar overall production. And those numbers are very good. They are all-star level numbers, but they aren’t numbers requisite with the best player in the game.

For 240 million over the following decade, the Angels weren’t hoping to acquire an all-star first baseman, they were looking for the best player in the game. Sure, they knew that the last two or three years of the deal would get ugly, but they also figured those decline years would be justified by these first few seasons of dominance. They weren’t alone either; before the season started, ESPN counted down the top 500 players in baseball for this season. They crowned Pujols #1.

Was there good cause to do so? Obviously, but there was also good cause not to. For starters, Pujols plays the least important defensive position on the diamond. Sure, he plays it very well, but basically for him to be the best player in baseball, he has to provide 99% of that value with his bat.

It’s a truth of our sports media bubble – and (ahem) the bloggers who exist increasingly on the inside of that bubble – they are slow to identify changing trends. We take for granted that what was true yesteryear continues to be true today. From 2003-2009 Albert Pujols was the best hitter in baseball. And with the exception of that guy out in San Francisco, it wasn’t even really close. Albert’s 62 WAR over those seven seasons leads A-Rod by 12, and A-Rod leads the eternally underrated Chase Utley by 9. Of course, WAR includes defense. For his prime, Pujols also led baseball* in batting average (.337), OBP (.435), SLG (.640), and wOBA (.443). HR (295), and – not that one should care – RBIs (855) and Runs (841). He was a beast. And, he was the best player in baseball.

* (I excluded Bonds, who only played about half the seasons in that span, but had otherworldly rate stats. Seriously, I know he was hopped up on flax seed oil and I know he was an arse, but go back and look at that 2001-2004 stretch, it was insane. We will never see anything like that again.)

The last two seasons? Pujols was still awesome, but… He was 8th in WAR, 6th in wOBA, 7th in OBP, 4th in SLG. Sure, he was still second in HRs, but the rate stats show a depreciation of his skills. Not a huge depreciation, but enough to lower him from the Demi-Gods to the extremely gifted mortals. And that’s an important drop.

Look, Pujols is going to hit a home run soon. Probably this weekend. And when does, he’s probably going to go on a run where he hits a bunch. He’s a really good hitter, and streaks are the nature of baseball. April just doesn’t represent a large enough sample size to tell you that Albert’s done. But, that also doesn’t mean that the games in April don’t count, they do. What Albert’s done, or not done, through 26 games does represent actual production, actual value. If Albert matches his exact 2011 numbers from May onward, his final season line will read:

.291/.348/.457 with 36 2B, 30 HR, and 56 BB.

That’s a solid player. When you add in his excellent base running and superb defense, it’s a borderline all-star, but is a borderline all-star what the Angels where hoping for when they gave him a 240 million ten year contract?


A King’s Ransom: Albert Pujols, The Angels, and a lot of Money…

December 8, 2011 Leave a comment

Boom… just like that the biggest dynamo in baseball’s winter free agent frenzy fell.  All week, as the threat of a hostile Miami takeover swirled, there remained rumors of a third team interested in St Louis slugger Albert Pujols.  Is it the Cubs?  The Rangers, the eerily quiet Yankees?  Nope, it was the Angels.  And damn, were they serious.

250 million serious.

Plus another 75 million for CJ Wilson.  That’s a big day of spending.  Not quite the Yankees dropping 423.5 on Mark Teixeira, CC Sabathia, and AJ Burnett (and yes, I smiled as I wrote AJ Burnett there), but a big day of spending all the same.  More importantly, it’s a shot straight across the bow of two time defending AL West champion Rangers.  After all, Wilson was the Rangers’ ace this past season, a 6 win pitcher for a team that won the division by 10 games.  The swing of him alone would have made the Angels at least co-favourites going into next year.  When you then add in the greatest right handed hitter of the last 50 years, well, you have something going.

Which is good, because the Angels need big returns early on this investment.  That’s because as great as Pujols has been for the last decade, he’s almost certainly not going to be that great for the coming one.  He probably wont even be half as great.  The Angels are paying a King’s ransom for a man in the process of abdicating his throne.

Fangraphs’ dollar value section (which uses WAR to calculate a dollar value that a player provided a club in a single year), determined that over his last ten seasons with the Cardinals, Phat Al was worth 297 million, however that number was bouyed by seven seasons in which the firstbaseman posted a WAR over 8.  Over the last four seasons Albert’s WAR has gone from 9.1 to 9.0, to 7.5, to 5.1.  Now, 5.1 is still very, very good, but it makes Pujols more Mo Vaughn than Lou Gherig.

To put it in further perspective, Pujols’ 2011 WAR was tied for 26th in all of baseball: with Brett Gardner.  Lets pause so that that can sink in… TWENTY SIXTH… BRETT GARDNER.  Now, don’t get me wrong, I love Gardner more that most, but… are you going to pay him 25 million a year?  20?  15?  Maybe 12?

I know, Pujols’ numbers last year were anchored by a horrendous start.  He had a .755 OPS, with 9 home runs on June 1st and finished with a .906 OPS and 37 homers.  But at 32 years old, moving to a pitchers park, in the harder league, what’s the upside in Pujols’ numbers?  Does his WAR get back to 2010s 7.5?  Is that a best case scenario?  And where does it go from there?

As Jeff Passan tweeted earlier today, in the years before he turned 32, ARod hit .306, .389, .578 in 154 games per year.  In the years since?  .284, .375, .521 in 124 games per year.  It’s that last number that’s perhaps most important.  It’s hard to post large WAR if you aren’t on the field.    Pujols, like ARod when he signed his big deal, has been a bedrock of good health, never missing more than 19 games and averaging 155 per, but he’s entering a phase of life where the body starts to break.  Just look to ARod’s hip for evidence of the  capriciousness of the post 32 body.  Now, obviously the comparison isn’t perfect, because ARod plays a far more physically demanding position, but as someone whose 32 year old back is aching right now, I can tell you that Father time’s a bitch.  Seriously.  And that’s looking at the issue on THIS side of the deal.  What happens in 2017, when Pujols is 37?  Does he suddenly become a 25 million dollar DH?  Is his bat still worth 5 wins, or has it drooped to 3?  And that’s – gasp – only half way through the contract.  What happens in the second half of the deal?!?

After adding Wilson to incumbents Jered Weaver, Dan Haren, and Ervin Santana, the Angels may well have the best rotation in the AL, and with Pujols they finally have a serious bat in the middle of their order, so I can’t entirely fault them for essentially ensuring a spot in the playoffs for the over the next four years, but there will come a day when they rue this contract.  I hope for their sake it’s in 2020, not 2016.


Trading Albert Pujols for Ryan Howard…

March 14, 2010 Leave a comment

There’s a report on ESPN today that the Philadelphia Phillies have been having internal discussions about trading star slugger Ryan Howard to St. Louis for Albert Pujols. That’s strange, because I’ve been having internal discussions about trading my bicycle for a Ferrari. I mean, I think it would be a good deal for the local dealership, because my bike has a really nifty basket on the front and it even has a pink Barbie Bell.

I know, I know, Ryan Howard is a really great player. He’s an MVP, he’s averaged 49.5 HRs in his four full seasons, and he’s won three RBI titles. Plus, he’s only been in the majors for five years, so he has a long career ahead of him. Thus, if St. Louis has doubts about whether or not they can sign Pujols, it would be smart for them to swap him for Howard, right?

Well, actually no. It would probably be one of the worst trades St. Louis could make. Right off the top, much like Minnesota with Joe Mauer, I’d be surprised if St. Louis didn’t come to a deal with their iconic player. In the article Buster Olney (who, don’t get me wrong, is a great baseball writer) mentions that Howard is from St. Louis and that’s really great, but Pujols has been the best player in baseball for the last six years, while wearing a Cardinals uniform. That’s a little more relevant to fans than where a kid went to grade school. He also equates it to the Twins moving Johan Santana and the Jays moving Doc, but the difference is that in those scenarios, those teams knew they had to move a player who was absolutely going to leave the following winter. Thus far, there is no sense that the Cardinals will lose Pujols, so I would imagine that they’ve barely begun to ponder the doomsday scenario of having to get equal return for the best player in baseball.

Having said that, even were the Cards to decide that trading Pujols was the only recourse, then moving him for Howard makes no sense. When Howard was a young buck, he was blocked from joining the Phillies by Jim Thome. Why does this matter? Because despite only four full seasons, Howard is actually a few months older than Pujols.

Which brings us to the talent. Without hyperbole, Pujols is the best player in baseball (with apologies to Mauer, and Hanley Ramirez), while Howard is the most overrated player in baseball (with apologies to almost everybody that Dayton Moore signs). To the casual fan (or the fan still using the triple crown stats), Howard seems like the preeminent slugger in MLB. His four top five MVP finishes certainly prove that mainstream journalists think he’s pretty good, and that’s because Howard does two things really well. One he hits a lot of home runs. Two, he hits behind Jimmy Rollins, Shane Victorino, and Chase Utley… what’s that? That’s not a skill that he has? Well, congratulations… You get it, now why can’t MVP voters?

Ok, yes I’m being a bit factious, but the RBI thing is so beyond debate at this point, that it’s kind of like arguing who won their breakup, Britney “I can’t find my underwear or my children” Spears or Justin “Dick in a Box” Timberlake.* Howard gets an inordinate amount of credit for hitting home runs, which is good, and batting behind Utley and company, which is contextual. He strikes out in record setting numbers, he doesn’t run the bases well, his defense is suspect (although much improved in 2009), and most importantly, he’s only average at getting on base.

*(If you’re new to this, then that’s fine, but lets just say that RBIs are what’s known as a context driven stat, so they don’t tell you much about someone as a hitter, other than that his teammates were on base. Want to know more? Well, it just so happens that the great and mystical Joe Posnanski wrote eight billion words on this topic yesterday)

Don’t get me wrong, it’s not that Howard isn’t a good player, certainly he is. It’s just that most Howard fans think those 140 RBI seasons mean he’s a top ten player in baseball, when he’s barely a top ten player at his own position (and since I know you’re going to argue this one, here’s an unofficial off the top of my head list: Pujols, Fielder, Cabrera, Teixeira, Gonzalez, Youkillis, Lee, Howard, Morneau, and Votto… although I might be forgetting someone and Votto might actually be too low). So, basically we have an inferior player, who’s slightly older, which would be fine, if Howard were signed to Evan Longoria’s contract (the best in baseball), but he’s not.

This year, King Albert will make 16 million, while Howard banks 19. Next year the Cardinals will have a 16 million option for Pujols, while the Phillies will be shelling out 20 million for Howard. Of course, the big reason that the Cards might have to move Pujols, is that in 2012, Albert is a free agent… but so is Howard.

I doubt that St. Louis has even considered the possibility of trading Pujols, let alone considering what they might want in return for him, but I can guarantee that unless Cards management wants to be looking for employment outside of baseball, there is no scenario in which they would consider moving Albert Pujols for Ryan Howard.

So, the Phillies can internally discuss it all day long, but that and five dollars will get them a coffee from Starbucks. Now, if you’ll excuse me, I have to bike downtown to pick up my new Ferrari…

%d bloggers like this: