Posts Tagged ‘New Orleans Hornets’

David Stern, Chris Paul, and the Big Market-Small Market Conundrum…

December 13, 2011 Leave a comment

It’s easy to get caught up in the hysteria of this hyper compressed NBA offseason; after all, in less than a week we’ve had Chris Paul traded to the Lakers, Chris Paul not traded to the Lakers, Chris Paul possibly almost traded to the Lakers again, the Lakers trading Lamar Odom to Dallas and thus ensuring that Chris Paul will not be traded to the Lakers, Chris Paul about to be traded to the Clippers, Chris Paul not about to be traded to the Clippers, Chris Paul about to be traded to the Clippers is still possible, and, as of this morning, the Clippers no longer pursuing Chris Paul about to be traded to the Clippers.  It’s exhausting.  And, frankly, if you’re a fan of Chris Paul’s Hornets, it’s probably a little nauseating.  While it feels like something HAS to happen with the Chris Paul hysteria this second, in reality there are still several months for the Hornets brass to gather and sift through trade offers.

At least that would be the case if it were Hornet officials who were actually in charge of deciding the future of Chris Paul.  Instead that luxury seems to fall to David Stern.  Proving himself to be a hands-on owner in the mold of Michael Heisley, Stern has inserted himself front and center in the Paul circus.  Reports of possible trade scenarios no longer begin with, “New Orleans GM Dell Demps is asking for…” but rather begin with, “the NBA front Office is asking for…” And what should be frightening to fans of the Hornets, well besides the thought that former Grizzlies GM Stu Jackson is leading negotiations for Stern, is that the price being demanded by the league is so exorbitant, that nobody can meet it.  That might be fine if there were a chance the Hornets could resign Paul this summer, but there isn’t.  He’s gone.  So, the best thing the franchise can do, is make a good trade and get back some pieces in exchange for their departing superstar.

The first trade that Demps lined up would have been a good deal, it would have kept the team competitive and in contention for a playoff spot.  The league nixed it, ostensibly because it didn’t include enough young talent, but in reality becuase it involved sending a big star to a major market immediately after the end of a lockout theoretically about restricting the ability of the big market teams to poach all the big stars.  Now, the problem is that Stern was so widely lampooned for turning that deal down, he has to actually kill in whatever trade the Hornets accept.  So, instead of approving a realistic and good offer from the Clippers – one that probably had more upside than the Lakers deal, although a dimmer immediate future – the NBA just keeps asking for more and more and more…

I think they’ll find a deal, and I think they’ll find a deal this week, but the longer this stretches on, the uglier it potentially gets.  What I still don’t understand, is how sending Paul to the Clippers is not sending him to a large market, when last I checked they play in the same building – let alone market – as the team that Dan Gilbert went apocalyptic about acquiring Paul.

This underscores what I mentioned the other day, that the large market-small market thing is really just a red herring.  What this is actually about is protecting the incompentent organisations from losing the talent that came to them through the fluke of the draft.  Take the five most notorious examples from the past two years:

  • LeBron James
  • Chris Bosh (and yes, we can quibble over him, but the Raptors thought of him as a franchise guy)
  • Carmelo Anthony
  • Dwight Howard
  • Chris Paul

Now, the only thing that their organisations did to “deserve” them, was be shitty enough to earn a pick in the top 4 of the NBA draft.  That’s how they earned these guys, so lets not make it out like these desperate small market teams have scoured the earth, found these rare looking lumps of coal and sat on them for 90 years until they became top ten basketball players.  No, they were crappy organisations, who were lucky enough to get a top pick in a good year (versus say in a year when Kwame Brown or Andrea Bargnani is the top prospect).  This sense of entitlement that Gilbert and the “small market” owners have to these players is misplaced and slightly asinine.

Then there’s the whole defecting the small market for the large market problem, which of course wasn’t a problem until last year.  But can we look closer at this problem?  What do all five of those teams have in common?  With the possible exception of Denver, outside of their superstar, they suck.  Not like, oh we’re probably not winning a title this year, but outright we might not win 20 games suck.  The year Michael Jordan retired from the Bulls (the first time), they still won 55 games.  How could they do that when they lost thier superstar?  Well, they still had Scottie Pippen, Horace Grant, Steve Kerr, Toni Kukoc, and Phil Jackson stalking the sideline.  In other words, they’d actually, you know, assmebled good players around their superstar.

Last year, after LeBron left the Cavs, they surged all the way to 19 wins.  The Raptors?  Well they just tore through the league, on their way to 22 wins.  Don’t tell me that the Cavs and Raps had put good players around their stars.  And then there’s Orlando.  Look at some of the moves made by Orlando GM Otis Smith over the last five years in an attempt to build a winner around his Superman.  You tell me which one you looked at, the day it was announced, and thought, “wow, that’s a great deal for the Magic.”

  • 2007 – Signed free agent Rashard Lewis to massive 118.2 million – 6 year contract.
  • 2007 – Signed restricted free agent Jameer Nelson to 35 million – 5 year contract.
  • 2007 – Traded Trever Ariza to the LA Lakers for Brian Cook and Maurice Evans.
  • 2009 – After making the NBA finals, allowed Hedo Turkoglu to leave via free agency and instead used that space to trade Courtney Lee, Rafer Alston, and Tony Battie to New Jersey for Vince Carter.
  • 2010 – Signed backup to your backups, backup Chris Duhon to a 15 million four year deal.
  • 2010 – Signed the ghost of Quentin Richardson for 7.5 million over three years.
  • 2010 – Traded Rashard Lewis’ bloated contract to the Washington Wizards for Gilbert “The Gun-toting Clown” Areans’ bloated contract.  This might have been a lateral move, except of course that Arenas has an extra year and 20 million on his deal (since amnestied).
  • 2010 – Tried to make up for the mistake of two years ago, by trading Marcin Gortat, Vince Carter, and Mkael Pietrus to Phoenix for Jason Richardson, Earl Clark, and the bloated, stubbed out cigarette remains of Hedo Turkoglu.

None, right?  And it’s not like I’m some master talent evaluator, I can barely find matching socks in the morning.  No, these were just blatantly bad deals from the get go.  What the Cavs and Magic did, was make it rain like Patrick Ewing at the Gold Club, assuming that giving large contracts to middling talent – or fading talent – was the same thing as building a championship squad around your star.  For all of their current cries of being “small markets,” each has had a payroll in excess of 90 million in the past five years.  That’s New York Knicks territory.

So, the problem arose, not because they weren’t able to spend, but because they weren’t able to spend intelligently.  Thus, their star wanted out.  It’s not like big markets don’t have the same problems.  At the start of the 2007 season Kobe Bryant famously demanded to be traded, and he was a phone call away from being shipped off to Chicago.  Instead the Lakers fleeced (sort of) the Grizzlies in a deal for Pau Gasol and well, you know the rest.  Did the Lakers keep Kobe because they’re a big market?  No, they kept Kobe because they made a smart move to surround him with a top fifteen talent.  And yes, it helps when you’re trying to stop your star from leaving if you can find Chris Wallace to trade with, but…

On the reverse side of the coin, you have three small market teams that managed to keep their stars: San Antonio, Portland, and Oklahoma City.  Tim Duncan’s obviously the poster boy of staying with a small market team and small market whiners say that he’s a special case, but why?  He was courted as a free agent and he chose to stay with the Spurs, because they’re a wicked smart organization that gave him the best chance to keep winning titles.  Pretty simple really; perhaps if they’d surrounded him with the likes of Mo Williams and Anthony Parker instead of Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili, maybe TD leaves for the big money deal offered to him by – gasp – the Orlando Magic.

Kevin Durant, well the press has made him out to be the anti-LeBron because he re-signed with the Zombie Sonics last year, but that’s unfair to both guys and, frankly, just a lazy narrative.  First, LeBron re-signed his first time up too, and second if Durant’s team wasn’t being run by Sam Presti, he might have made a different choice.  The point is that he’s on a team with Russel Westbrook, James Harden, Serge Ibaka, Eric Maynor, and Kendrick Perkins.  Plus, the Zombies haven’t destroyed their cap structure to assemble that talent.  So, Durant stays because there’s something worth staying for.

Finally, three years ago, before his knees when tits up, when Brandon Roy was a free agent, he didn’t flee Portland for a larger market, why?  Because they were young, they were talented and they were building something (and sure it’s since come crashing down, but despite that they to win 48 games last year with their best player a shell of his former self).  Now, you could counter that Roy wasn’t a superstar, and maybe he wasn’t in name recognition, but between 2007 and 2009 he was better than Carmelo or Bosh.  So, even if his name lacked the cache of those other guys, there were plenty of smart GMs who would’ve loved signing him.

To say that those five superstars left their teams because they’re small markets misses the point – especially as Miami is a mid-market franchise, albeit in a desirable location.  It wasn’t the size of the market, but rather stupid team management that led to the superstar wanting to leave. I’m sorry Minnesota, Sacramento, Washington, Cleveland, and whoever else is crying poor, but it’s true.  If you want to compete with the Lakers, you need to be smarter than them (given that mind boggling Lamar Odom trade this really shouldn’t be that hard)

Which brings us back to the Hornets, who were a second round playoff team last year.  Now, admitedly they just lost thier second best palyer as well, but if they lose Paul for nothing, how many games do you think they’d win next year?  15? 18? 22?  It’d be Charles Dickens bleak.  The Hornets Paul problem isn’t because they’re a small market, and it’s not because New Orleans isn’t a desirable place to live – it’s New Orleans for f***s sake – it’s because Paul watched the team sign a washed up Peja Stojakovic, trade away Tyson Chandler twice, and acquire freaking Willie Green.  They were poorly run and then bought by the league.  What’s the upside of hanging around for more?

All of which makes this Paul trade the most important deal in Hornets franchise history.  So, I can understand Stern holding out for a great deal, what I can’t understand is having Stu Jackson negotiate that deal.  That’s the sort of bush-league move that a small market team makes…


The Trade that Wasn’t, or How David Stern stepped in Poop..

December 9, 2011 Leave a comment

Oh the NBA, how I missed you.  I mean, even when you somehow manage to salvage the negative publicity of a lost season, you still manage to shoot yourself in the foot with an audaciously absurd and stupid move to cancel the proposed trade of Chris Paul to the Lakers.  I get it, really, I do… your ownership group almost sabotaged the season on the pre-text that you wanted to implement competitive balance (which is a bit of a red herring anyhow, but that’s another story, for another day…), when in reality what you actually wanted was to ensure as much money in your pockets as possible.

Now, basically minutes after the deal was ratified, the team that you collectively own – in a small market – is trying to send its best player to basically your league’s biggest market (in terms of combined size and success).  If you let it pass, then your rhetoric about small market teams is shown to be what it was: bullshit.  So, I can see how the knee jerk reaction is to torpedo the deal – especially when you have this moron sending subversive emails.

On the other hand, this actually was a good deal for the Hornets (not to mention the Rockets), and – despite picking up one of the top five players in the league – an odd trade for the Lakers.  I don’t know that I’d go quite as far as ESPNs John Hollinger in trashing it (insider), but he’s right that leaving your team with only the unrelaible Andrew Bynum as a big man is a huge mistake.  Now, maybe the Lakers were going to swap Bynum for Orlando’s Howard, but if the Magic were going for that, then the league has bigger problems than this Paul deal.

An even greater mistake is the league stepping in to sabotage the deal for “basketball reasons.”  Honestly, I don’t even know what basketball reasons are, and if you follow any NBA writers on twitter, neither does anyone else.  It’s like David Stern just stepped in a flaming bag of poop on his front stoop, only he’s the one who put the bag there.  I’ve argued in the past that Stern, while one of the three greatest sports commissioners of all time, desperately needs to step down and I think that the last five months only compound that fact.  The best example of this was a tweet yesterday (that I can no longer find, so I apologize to the author) that compared the damage done in the last two years by Stern to his legacy to a certain narcissistic indecisive, self photographing football player.

Stern’s league now has three teams grieving the cancellation of a perfectly legal – and legitimate – trade, another team accusing a fifth team of tampering and a sixth team whose owner cannot stop sounding like an ungrateful and petulant toddler when his toy was taken away.  Worst of all?  None of these shenanigans involve Donald Sterling – which should serve to remind Stern of the words of wisdom from the great philosopher Calvin, “That’s one of the remarkable things about life.  It’s never so bad that it can’t get worse.”

Ah Calvin – the 6 year, not the protestant – always there to remind us of the salient points in life.  The NBA looks pretty stupid right now, but hey, it can always get worse!

Oh NBA, I missed you.

NBA Losers Part Two…

May 15, 2010 Leave a comment

So, last week David “I used to be with “it,” but then they changed what “it” was, and now what I’m with, isn’t “it,” and what’s “it” is weird and scary to me” Stern complained about people spending all their time talking about the NBA offseason, while the playoffs were ongoing. Since I’m sure that Stern is a regular reader of Sports on the Brain, I know that that was really just a pointed comment at me. So, I decided to stop my NBA Losers Series after just the Eastern Conference.

Or, maybe not… Sorry David, but your league is just too much fun to play ‘God’ with. Look, it’s partly your fault. I mean the NBA has this ridiculously convoluted salary structure, which makes it complicated and fun to ponder the future. But it’s also the nature of basketball. The other three major sports have such large rosters, that it’s hard to see how one guy drastically improves your team. I mean, if you’re cheering for an NFL team, obviously you hope they acquire Tom “Two Girls, Two Babies, why oh why does my sperm have to be as golden as the rest of me?” Brady, but short of that it’s hard to sit down with a trade machine and say, ‘ok, if I trade Albert Haynesworth for a right guard and a backup strong safety my team will be better.’ In hoops on the other hand, the roster’s are small enough that you can look at them and say, “If I trade Leandro Barbosa and Earl Clark to Cleveland for LeBron James, the Suns would be better…

So, David, while we here at Sports on the Brain hear your protests, we counter that in this day of laptops on every couch, PDAs in every hand, and two sided beer hats on every head (what, that’s not how you start your day?), it is entirely possible to be engaged in the NBA playoffs whilst simultaneously making over the rosters of every NBA loser from the Western Conference.

So, lets get on with the 3,500 word explosion…

Houston Rockets (42-40):

The Rockets were the team left out of the West’s merry-go-round playoff race, falling out with a 9-16 start to 2010. Still, GM Daryl “Dork Elvis” Morey made a great play at the allstar break, sending Tracy “Quitting on my team came naturally, I’m Vince Carter’s Cousin” McGrady’s expiring deal to the Knicks for Kevin Martin, Jared Jeffries, and seven hundred Knick draft picks. It was a slick piece of work from one of the NBAs top GMs.

Morey has shown himself a master of finding fringe players to play important roles. Of course, this has been imperative for the Rockets, because in McGrady and Yao “I’m actually a 7’5” robot operated by a 3’4” Irish guy” Ming, they’ve had two superstars incapable of playing a full season. With TMac departed and Yao in the final year of his deal, the Rockets are firmly entrenched in turning over their roster from the ‘Careful Contents are Extremely Fragile’ era.

Getting a healthy Yao back will certainly improve the team, but with every injury that the giant Chinese pottery dish sustains, he becomes a little more fragile. That’s why I expect that the Rockets will be one of the 27 teams who kick the tires around for Chris Bosh. The Rockets could put together a package that involves the expiring deals of Shane Battier or Jared Jeffries, with young pieces like Jordan Hill and Kyle Lowry. They also have established players in Kevin Martin and Trevor Ariza who could entice the Raptors in a sign and trade.

If I’m Toronto GM Bryan “I made one smart move – signing Steve Nash – and have parlayed that into a sterling reputation” Colangelo I’d be tempted to accept a deal with the Rockets of a re-signed Bosh for Hill, Lowry, a draft pick and Battier (whom, I’d try and flip to a contender). Obviously, if I’m the Rockets I’d rather keep Battier and give up Jeffries, but… actually, who am I kidding, this is Dork Elvis trading with an organization that once traded Vince Carter for Aaron Williams, Eric Williams, and Alonzo Mourning and then when Mourning refused to report, instead of forcing his hand by suspending him without pay, they bought him out. Yeah! Of course Colangelo’s going to let the Rockets include Jeffries over Battier.

That gives Houston a strong roster for next year:

PG – A. Brooks,
SG – K. Martin, C. Buddinger
SF – T. Ariza, S. Battier
PF – C. Bosh, L. Scola
C – Y. Ming, C Hayes

A backup point guard, another shooter, and maybe another post defender and the Rockets are contenders. And you know that Dork Elvis can find those guys off the scrap heap.

Memphis Grizzlies (40-42):

Most pundits (including this one) had the Grizzlies strung up and hanging over somebody’s fireplace before last season, but somehow their disparate castoffs bounded together like some “lovable losers” movie and instead of winning 25 games, they won 40 and remained in the playoff hunt well into March.

Still, despite the positive play that the team experienced this year, there’s no disputing that the Grizzlies have terrible, terrible karma. In the fifteen years since this franchise was created, they’ve won 50 games once, they’ve never finished higher than fourth in their division and they’ve never made it out of the first round. On the flip side, they’ve won fewer than 25 games an incredible ten times. Seriously, TEN times in 15 years. It’s almost like they’re cursed…

So, while this season was exciting for fans of the Teddy Bears, it’s hard not to see that everything broke just right. Zach “I’m like a Chimera, I’ve got the body of a man and the head of a sheep” Randolph was having a eureka moment and salvaging his career, but it’s even odds that he falls back into the habit of making dumb plays and hotboxing his car after games. Likewise, Rudy Gay could sign an offer sheet that makes owner Michael “Do I get some sort of plaque for being the cheapest owner in the NBA? No, well I’ll make one myself then. Wait, it costs how much? Oh no, that’s far too expensive” Heisley curl up in bed and suck his thumb until the seven day matching period has passed. And the grizzlies could use their second overall pick in the draft on a stiff like Hasheem Thabeet. Wait, what?!? They did that? Last year? Wow…

Anyhow, put like that, it’s not hard to see how this seemingly exciting season for the Teddy Bears could quickly turn back to another 24 win season. Why? Well, as I noted before, I think this team is cursed. I think that when the Grizzlies were founded, it’s fairly even odds that Orca Bay Sports broke ground on a Native burial ground in Vancouver. The Coast Salish people surely responded by cursing the franchise. It’s really the only logical conclusion. So, the Grizzlies need to reverse this curse, they need to improve their Karma. As I see it, there’s clearly only one way to do this…


That’s right. It’s time for Heisly to sell the team and the new owner should pick up this crumbling foundation, shed the Grizzlies morbid history and return to Seattle where the Supersonics championship banner and rich history are just waiting for someone to claim them. In this way, the Grizzlies could remove the curse, right a Karmic wrong, and go further towards improving their team than any offseason move the front office could conduct.

New Orleans (37-45):

The Hornets are a mess. They might have one of the five best players in basketball, on the other hand, they might just have a guy who was really great until his body became star crossed and he couldn’t stay healthy. On top of that, even if we assume that Chris Paul comes back to full health, the Hornets’ roster looks a lot like Meg Ryan’s plastic surgery.

They’ve made a series of terrible decisions, that have left them saddled with an old, misshapen, expensive roster. It really started with offering Peja Stojakovic a 60 million five year contract, followed by thinking that because James Posey had won two titles with two different teams, that he was the second coming of Robert Horry. I like Posey and he was instrumental in the Celtics 2008 championship, but he’s no Big Shot Rob. They traded for Tyson Chandler’s big contract and bigger medical history, which meant that they eventually had to swap him for Emeka Okafor’s equally outsized contract.

The result of all these moves, is that the Hornets, who in 2007-08 seemed to be a comet ascending to the NBA’s penthouse, are rammed right up against the luxury tax, paying almost two million per victory last year. Aggravating the situation, they continue to be owned by one of the worst owners in sports and he remains unwilling to pay the luxury tax. Things this year became so bad that the media started speculating the Hornets would trade Chris Paul… Whoa… There… Tiger. Lets not get all crazy here. There’s smart ways to save money and then there’s franchise suicide. You trade Paul when you’re committing the later.

So, if you read the bulging, steroid induced part 1 of this column, then you know that I think the Hornets can be enticed into swapping bad contracts or giving up young stud point guard Darren “Chris Paul Lite” Collison as long as they save dolla, dolla, bills y’all. So, if you’ve got deep pockets (cough-jamesdolan-cough) and you’re willing to absorb James Posey and/or Emeka Okafor’s contract, you might well be able to get Collison as a prize.

If I’m the Hornets brass, I talk to Knicks GM Donnie Walsh about swapping Okafor and Collison for Eddy Curry’s (finally) expiring contract and Wilson Chandler. If the Knicks strike out on the free agent market, then this might not be a deal they’re interested in, but if they come away with any two of LeBron, Wade, Bosh, Joe Johnson, or Amare, then they are going to need to surround them with a) bodies, any freaking bodies, b) someone to play the point, c) someone to play center, and d) more bodies.

Obviously Curry’s useless and would immediately be bought out, at which point like Keyser Soze the NBA public would probably never see him again, but shedding Okafor’s salary would leave the Hornets in a very enviable position for 2011. I think that the Hornets are basically stuck for this year, but if they clear off enough cap space they could become players in 2011. Who’s available in 2011 you ask?

Well, actually almost nobody, except Carmelo Anthony. Could the Hornets get Anthony? I don’t know, but they have three factors in their favor: 1) They play in New Orleans. 2) Bringing a winner to post-Katrina New Orleans is gold for a player’s national profile. 3) Chris Paul. Paul is the kind of player that every guy wants to play with. He’s a natural point, who understands how to get easy buckets for his guys, and he’s also a dynamic talent in his own right.

If the Hornets signed Carmelo, re-signed David West, added two lottery picks (since they’d definitely be in the lottery next year) and had Paul return to health, well, then you would see a shooting comet back to the NBA’s penthouse.

Los Angeles Clippers (29-53):

Oh the Clippers… what in the world to do with the Clippers. I mean besides having aliens come down and abduct Donald “A racist in a mostly black league” Sterling? The reality is that for all of his coaching faults, over the last couple years Mike “Wait, you fired me just because I was in the middle of my sixth losing season in my seven years on the job? That’s unfair, I just needed a little more time” Dunleavy, or whomever was operating the front office for him, actually made some solid roster moves. The Clippers have a decent core (Blake Griffin, Chris Kaman, Eric Gordon), a mercurial, but talented point guard, Baron “This kids is how you grow a beard” Davis, and 20 plus million in cap space. The Clippers problem is that no matter what happens, they’re owned by Sterling, so… yeah. There’s really no point in suggesting anything here. They will probably drastically overpay for Rudy Gay, trade Davis to New York for Curry and then subject their fan base to another 29 win season. The NBA, where racist, meddlesome owners who ruin a franchise for 30 years happens…

Golden State Warriors (26-56):

Well, the news this spring that Chris Cohan is going to sell the team is good. That it hasn’t happened yet is bad. Cohan is a problem, Bob Rowell is a problem, and sadly Don Nelson is a problem. The solution is in Steph Curry, Anthony Randolph, and what should hopefully be a top five pick. Of course, knowing the Warriors they will come away from the draft with Derrick Cousins, who has million dollar, prodigious talent… and a ten cent head.

If I ran the Warriors, then the object of the summer would be to move Monta Ellis, focus the team around Curry, Randolph and Anthony Morrow, and try like a madman to draft Evan Turner. For instance, lets assume that the Warriors can trade Ellis to the Timberwolves for a package built around Kevin Love and Ricky Rubio. Minnesota GM David Kahn seems like exactly the type of guy to be enamored with Ellis’ gaudy point totals from last season and he has to do something with Rubio. Which makes him a good mark.

Now, Rubio’s still under contract in Barcelona, but, I’m just going to assume that Larry Ellison is the guy who buys the Warriors and that he makes some sort of under the table sweetheart deal to extricate Rubio from that contract. I know, I know, it’s a violation of NBA rules, but if you think Ellison became one of the 20 richest men in the world without knowing how to bend some rules, well…

Then I’d trade Andris Biedrins to the Bulls for Kirk Hinrich. This is a risky trade, because Biedrins is still relatively young with decent upside and Hinrich’s overrated, but I like Kirk’s defense and I think (hope) that a change of scenery will help him find his shooting touch.

Finally, I’d flex Ellison’s fiscal muscles, by taking on the onerous contract of Emeka Okafor. This is of course incredibly risky as we walk unbound towards the end of the NBAs collective bargaining agreement, but… sometimes in life it’s just a chance you gotta take. Vladimir Radmanovich’s expiring contract and Brandon Wright add up to enough to get Okafor. For New Orleans, this clears around 42 million off of their payroll and gives them Wright who may or may not have some upside.

That’s a lot of switching, swapping, slashing, and other words that start with ‘S”, but after all of that, you have a young explosive roster:

PG – R. Rubio, K. Hinrich
SG – S. Curry, A. Morrow
SF – E. Turner, C. Maggette, K. Azubuike
PF – K. Love, A. Randolph
C – E. Okafor, R. Turiaf

I’m not going to lie, of the sixteen shitty rosters I’ve overhauled in the last two weeks, this might be my favouite. You’ve got: shooters Curry, Hinrich, and Azubuike; magicians Rubio and Love; defenders Hinrich, Okafor, and Turiaf; an upside youngster in Randolph; and a potential superstar in Evan Turner. I’d hire a young up-tempo coach, who would get these horses running by deploying a D’Antoni “shoot it from anywhere” style offence. They’d be young, exciting and they’d bring some buzz back to Bay Area hoops.

Sacramento Kings (25-57):

Draft Derrick Favours. Use your cap space to acquire a point guard. Move Tyreke Evans to the two, where he can be a destructive offensive force, without worrying about getting others involved. Linse, rather, repeat. What? I’m nuzzled right up against the 3,500 magic barrier I swore to myself I wouldn’t pass. Do you really want me to drop 750 words on the Kings? Didn’t think so.

Minnesota Timberwolves (15-67):

Well, for starters they could fire David Kahn, who so horribly botched last year’s draft, and offer the job to Simmons. After that, it really comes down to what draft pick they get. Just for the sake of amusement (and because the NBA playoffs are in their month long hiatus… the NBA, where TV scheduling ruining the momentum of the playoffs happens!), I played the lottery thingy-mahooty ten times and the T-Wolves average finish was 2.5, which didn’t help me much. So, I played it an eleventh time and they finished… 2nd. Yup, that was a great use of time. No wonder I’m 43 years old and working for McDonalds.

So, with the second pick, and assuming that whomever drafts first takes Wall, then the Wolves instantly become better by taking… Derrick Cousins! No, just kidding, they obviously draft Evan Turner. The Wolves also have the 16th and 23rd picks, so I’d probably use those on Gordon Hayward and someone to stash “Spurs like” overseas for three years.

Step number two is to decide which front court player you want to build around. For me, I’d trade Al Jefferson, because the Wolves need so much and Jefferson will bring a better return. Charlotte desperately needs some low post scoring and they always seem to be willing to move Gerald Wallace. I love the defender that Wallace was this year and Minnesota could use his athleticism on the wing. I’d also have the Bobcats toss in the underrated Nazar Mohammed into the deal, in exchange for Wayne “Of course Michael Jordan wants me on the Bobcats, I went to North Carolina” Ellington.

Third is the dousy. The Wolves are rolling around in cap space, but also play their home games in Minnesota, so what exactly should they do with the money? Basically, you have to use it to take a player from a team that can no longer afford him, or that doesn’t want him anymore for personnal reasons. Thus, I pick up my phone and call Ernie Grunfeld and say, alright, send Gilbert Arenas over this way…”

Kidding, seriously it was a joke, I prefer my shoes without poop in them. I’d call the Lakers. We all think that they have endless resources, because, well, they’re the freaking Lakers, but Jerry Buss isn’t Paul Allen. His pockets have bottoms and the word out of LA was that this year’s 100 million roster was really dragging the bottom of Buss’ pockets. I’d offer youngster Johnny Flynn (see below) for Lamar Odom. Then I’d try to acquire Golden State’s Corey Maggette. This team needs some offence and Maggette is an absurd scorer. He’s also strangely underrated at this point and I think the Wolves would basically just be happy to clear him off their cap.

Finally, Minnesota’s biggest problem is what oh what to do with Ricky Rubio. Hey, wait, I’ve got a good idea, why not draft Rubio with one pick and then with your very next pick, take another point guard, then draft a third at 17, and a fourth in the second round. But why stop there when you can… wait for it… wait… just wait… sign a point guard, Ramon Sessions, to a four year 17.5 million contract. Whooo… the David Kahn era, feel the dysmorphia.

So, now whomever is running the Wolves this offseason is stuck with a phenomenal point guard in Europe, who wont come stateside for at least another year and seems fairly determined not to play for the Wolves. What do you do with him? Beats the heck out of me, that’s why I recommended giving the job to Simmons. Cop out answer? Well, yes I guess it was.

Actually, the answer is pretty easy. You fly to Barcelona, eat some tapas, drink some sangria, take a little stroll on the beach where the women will make your head explode and then go and find your future allstar point guard and convince him that he wants to leave one of the five coolest (not literally) cities in the world and move to one of the five coolest (literally) cities in the world.

Basically, you take flowers and a box of chocolates and you woo Rubio. You tell him that it was the previous regime that drafted Flynn and that you’re trading the other dude. You tell him that you’re fully committed to his success and that he will start. You tell him that Minnesota has some of the best ice fishing in the world… Seriously, Rubio is a big time talent. Pair him in the backcourt with Turner and you have the NBA’s best guard pairing for as long as you can keep them. You tell him whatever you can to get his ass on a plane to Minneapolis.

Add all that up and here’s what you’ve got:

PG – R. Rubio, R. Sessions
SG – E. Turner, C. Brewer
SF – G. Wallace, C. Maggette, G. Hayward
PF – K. Love, L. Odom, R. Gomes
C – N. Mohammed, D. Milicic

Need a stop? Send out Turner, Brewer, Wallace, Odom, and Darko. Need a basket? Rubio, Tuner, Maggette, Love, and Odom probably get you one. Want wicked ball movement? Well, you’re getting that from Rubio, Tuner, Love and Odom. Want to play small? Rubio, Sessions, Turner, Odom, and Love, play small but with absurd length. Want to play big? Tuner, Maggette, Wallace, Darko, and Mohammed, ok I have no idea why you’d play Darko more than 4 minutes a game, but you get my point. Want versatility? Turner, Wallace, Odom, and Gomes are all switch army knives capable of playing multiple roles and multiple positions. That’s the beauty of this team, versatility. I like it, maybe not quite as much as that Warriors roster, but it’s certainly no coincidence that they share four players in common. I think this is a playoff team in 2011, but at the very least it’s a hundred times better than the 15 win poo-poo platter the Wolves sent out there this year.

Well, with that… I’m spent… Only 200 words over my magic number. Look for part three, NBA first round losers, some time around 2018.

%d bloggers like this: